Thursday, February 5, 2026

A bitter 12 months for impartial voters

Election time is right here in New York Metropolis and each New Yorker has the equal alternative to specific essentially the most fundamental of rights in a democracy — the proper to a significant vote. Proper? Unsuitable. If, like me, you’re certainly one of our metropolis’s 1.1 million impartial voters, you may very properly be questioning what nation you reside in — should you hassle to indicate up on the polls in any respect.

In case you have been to cease a vacationer in Occasions Sq. and describe a metropolis the place 1.1 million voters, 20% of all registered voters, have been legally barred from collaborating in public elections, the place do you assume they’d think about that metropolis to be? China? Russia? Venezuela? No, that’s NYC which bars independents from major elections their taxes pay for; elections that usually decide the eventual winner in November.

The injustice started lengthy earlier than our metropolis held this 12 months’s major elections — when prematurely of the first each registered impartial voter obtained a textual content like I did from the NYC Board of Elections. It supplied to assist me depart my impartial standing and register as a Democrat or Republican. Think about if the town despatched comparable messages to Democrats or Republicans and supplied to assist them be part of the opposite occasion? However that’s enterprise as regular in a metropolis that flagrantly works to disclaim that impartial voters are reliable.

This spring, a whole bunch of impartial voters confirmed as much as testify earlier than the metropolis’s Constitution Revision Fee. Opening up the town’s primaries to independents grew to become essentially the most testified to situation over the course of hearings in each borough. New York independents requested for one thing quite simple and really profound — allow us to vote. The fee took them significantly, discovering that opening the primaries would enhance turnout and competitors and make elections extra inclusive and consultant.

They found that regardless of stereotypes in any other case, NYC independents are 54% voters of coloration and a majority are underneath the age of 40. They’re engaged politically and vote for drawback solvers not ideologues. And the fee was ready to do one thing about it. That’s till leaders of NYC’s Democratic Get together and Working Households Get together like metropolis Comptroller Brad Lander confirmed as much as demand elections keep precisely as they’re and browbeat the fee into abandoning the hassle.

As independents, we watched the primaries from afar, because the frontrunner Zohran Mamdani gained the Democratic major with lower than half one million votes in a metropolis with 5 million registered voters (100,000 or so extra votes have been redistributed later underneath RCV). His margin of victory was 100,000 votes. What sort of authority comes from successful an election by such margins when 1.1 million New Yorkers by no means had the possibility to take part?

Even within the runup to the overall election, all three mayoral candidates have been largely silent on the problem of impartial voters. Not one has campaigned to us, talked about us, and even acknowledged we exist. Not one has pledged to take the findings of the Constitution Revision Fee and transfer them ahead.

Now as independents we discover ourselves voting in a uncommon aggressive race for mayor; the results of a number of candidates being compelled to sidestep our damaged election course of.

In case you’re not a reflexively Democratic Get together voter, you might have seen the inequality of a poll that lists Mamdani first and third, adopted by a Republican candidate Curtis Sliwa — who ran unopposed in his occasion’s major, whereas relegating impartial candidate Andrew Cuomo to a secondary line and to the far nook, together with Eric Adams and Jim Walden, who aren’t even operating anymore. Whomever your most well-liked candidate, there was nothing democratic about that poll.

NYC is an outlier. Nationwide, 85% of cities, together with most main cities reminiscent of Chicago and Los Angeles, let all residents, together with independents, vote for who they need within the primaries. It’s not simply the proper factor to do, however whenever you let voters centered on drawback fixing vote, you’re in a a lot better place to sort out actual issues — from reasonably priced housing to rising inequality.

Yearly the impartial New Yorkers’ share of the voters grows and we’re not going away. We’re beginning to set up and demand what each citizen calls for in a democracy. Allow us to vote.

Gruber is the senior vice chairman of Open Primaries, a nationwide election reform group and an writer of “Let All Voters Vote: Independents and the Enlargement of Voting Rights in the US.” 

Related Articles

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Latest Articles