Wednesday, February 11, 2026

Raskin: Trump Talked about “Extra Than a Million Instances” in Unredacted Epstein Information

By Sharon Zhang

This text was initially printed by Truthout

Raskin stated a doc within the information additionally undermines Trump’s declare that he kicked Epstein out of Mar-a-Lago.

President Donald Trump has repeatedly claimed that he had “nothing to do with” Jeffrey Epstein. However his title reportedly seems within the unredacted information a minimum of one million instances, Rep. Jamie Raskin (D-Maryland) stated on Tuesday after being granted entry to the paperwork.

Raskin informed Axios that he searched Trump’s title within the information on Monday, and it got here up “greater than one million instances.”

This can be a clear contradiction to what Trump has claimed about his involvement with the kid intercourse trafficker. 

Raskin has additionally informed the press that he has discovered direct proof undermining Trump’s declare that he barred Epstein from staying at his Mar-a-Lago membership in Florida. Trump has maintained that he banned Epstein from Mar-a-Lago when he was frequently poaching employees from the spa, together with 16-year-old Virginia Giuffre, and exposing himself to staff.

Nonetheless, Raskin stated that there’s a doc throughout the information saying that Trump by no means banned him, in line with a 2009 e mail trade between Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell. Within the dialog, Epstein informed Maxwell of a dialog he had together with his lawyer, who spoke with Trump.

“Trump is paraphrased and quoted as saying, ‘No, Jeffrey Epstein was not a member of Mar-a-Lago, however he was a visitor at Mar-a-Lago, and no, we by no means requested him to depart,’” Raskin stated of the trade to Axios.

Raskin’s findings are a drastic departure from earlier studies discovering that there are 38,000 mentions of Trump, his spouse, or Mar-a-Lago within the redacted information that have been launched by the Trump administration on the finish of January. 

MS NOW reporter Matt Fuller famous that, if Raskin’s search was correct, then it implies that “the Division of Justice redacted greater than 96% of the mentions of Trump.”

Raskin has accused the Trump administration of finishing up a “cowl up” in regard to the information, and has stated that he and different lawmakers discovered “tons of utterly pointless redactions, along with the failure to redact the names of victims” after they reviewed the unredacted information. 

“The DOJ is giving Members of Congress simply 4 computer systems in a satellite tv for pc workplace to learn the unredacted Epstein File of greater than 3 million paperwork. Working 40 hours every week on nothing else however this, it might take greater than seven years for the 217 Members who signed the Home discharge petition to learn simply the paperwork they’ve determined to launch (and there are 3 million nonetheless being withheld),” stated Raskin in a put up on X. 

“That is what a canopy up appears like,” Raskin stated.

The White Home has been on the protection. On Monday, Deputy Legal professional Common Todd Blanche asserted over a number of posts on X that “DOJ is hiding nothing” and it’s “dedicated to transparency.” 

This, in fact, ignores the truth that the Trump administration has redacted enormous swaths of the paperwork, with officers truly eradicating some redactions after Raskin and Representatives Ro Khanna (D-California) and Thomas Massie’s (R-Kentucky) outcry on Tuesday.

On the Home flooring on Tuesday, Khanna named six males whose names he stated have been redacted from the official launch of the information after he and Massie reviewed the unredacted paperwork on the DOJ for 2 hours on Tuesday. These individuals have been Les Wexner, a prolific Ohio billionaire, Sultan Ahmed bin Sulayem, an influential Emirati businessman, and 4 others whose identities are nonetheless comparatively unknown: Nicola Caputo, Salvatore Nuara, Zurab Mikeladze and Leonic Leonov.


This article was initially printed by Truthout and is licensed beneath Artistic Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0). Please keep all hyperlinks and credit in accordance with our republishing tips.



Related Articles

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Latest Articles