A Nashville man has taken BetMGM to court docket in Tennessee, arguing the sportsbook let him proceed playing for years after he had formally requested to be blocked. The case, now in Davidson County Chancery Court docket, claims that the corporate didn’t honor its personal self-exclusion guidelines.
Dilvar Tayip says he signed up for Tennessee’s voluntary self-exclusion checklist on June 16, 2021. On that very same day, he additionally enrolled in BetMGM’s separate exclusion program. Based on his amended petition, each have been supposed to maintain him from betting till June 16, 2026.
Court docket filings describe Tayip as an skilled sports activities bettor who had beforehand seen monetary success. Nonetheless, he determined in 2021 to step away from playing fully for 5 years. His lawsuit says the state eliminated him from its checklist sooner than anticipated, in Might 2023, however insists that change mustn’t have affected BetMGM’s impartial restriction.
He factors on to the corporate’s personal coverage, which states, “Self-exclusion is irrevocable and binding for your entire chosen period. As soon as a buyer selects a self-exclusion interval, it can’t be reversed or shortened underneath any circumstances. Elimination from a state checklist doesn’t alter or override the operator’s separate exclusion obligations.”
What the BetMGM lawsuit in Tennessee claims occurred subsequent
Tayip argues that regardless of that language, BetMGM allowed him to renew wagering shortly after his elimination from the state checklist. He says he continued putting bets from Might 2023 by way of roughly June 2025, with complete wins and losses nearing $300,000 throughout that stretch.
The submitting additionally leans on one other a part of BetMGM’s coverage, which says any wagers positioned by a self-excluded consumer ought to be voided and refunded. As a substitute, Tayip claims these bets have been processed usually.
As a part of the grievance, his attorneys included screenshots they are saying present wagers positioned whereas the exclusion remained lively. One instance exhibits a March 23, 2025 parlay with a $1,000 stake and a attainable payout of $7,454.55. Further data level to bets from Might 6, 2025, together with wagers of $1,454 and $750.
The lawsuit accuses BetMGM of a variety of violations, together with breaches of the Tennessee Sports activities Gaming Act and the Tennessee Client Safety Act. It additionally alleges negligence, fraud, unjust enrichment, and breach of contract. The submitting states BetMGM “knew, or ought to have recognized,” that Tayip was susceptible after formally requesting to be excluded by way of 2026. It additional claims the corporate inspired him to return to betting and, in earlier filings tied to a federal case document, suggested him on the right way to go away the state exclusion checklist early.
Tayip is asking for reimbursement of the cash he wagered throughout that interval, together with further damages, legal professional charges, and different reduction.
Different experiences have pointed to alleged underage advertising and marketing emails tied to BetMGM in Massachusetts and a separate class motion lawsuit in opposition to DraftKings accusing the corporate of exploiting customers with playing addictions.
In the meantime, a March 2026 court docket order exhibits Chancellor I’Ashea L. Myles break up Tayip’s unique submitting, directing that administrative appeals and separate claims transfer ahead independently underneath totally different case numbers.
ReadWrite has reached out to BetMGM for remark.
Featured picture: BetMGM / Canva
