Do you know that Truthout is a nonprofit and independently funded by readers such as you? If you happen to worth what we do, please help our work with a donation.
California Gov. Gavin Newsom, thought-about by some to be the frontrunner to be the subsequent Democratic presidential nominee, stated throughout a panel on Wednesday that he desires his celebration to be a “huge tent” that welcomes massive numbers of individuals into the fold. However he’s “adamantly towards” some of the common proposals Democrats have to supply: a wealth tax.
In October, progressive economists Emmanuel Saez and Robert Reich joined forces with considered one of California’s strongest unions, the Service Workers Worldwide Union’s (SEIU) United Healthcare Employees West, to suggest that California put the nation’s first-ever wealth tax on the poll in November 2026.
They described the measure as an “emergency billionaires tax” aimed toward recouping the tens of billions of {dollars} that will probably be stripped from California’s 15 million Medicaid recipients over the subsequent 5 years, after Republicans enacted historic cuts to this system in July with President Donald Trump’s One Massive Lovely Invoice Act, which dramatically diminished taxes for the wealthiest Individuals.
Amongst these beneficiaries had been the roughly 200 billionaires dwelling in California, whose common annual earnings, Saez identified, has risen by 7.5% per 12 months, in contrast with 1.5% for median-income residents.
Beneath the proposal, they might pay a one-time 5% tax on their complete internet price, which is estimated to boost $100 billion. The overwhelming majority of the funds, about 90%, could be used to revive Medicaid funding, whereas the remainder would go in the direction of funding Ok-12 schooling, which the GOP has additionally slashed.
The proposal in California has robust help from unions and healthcare teams. However Newsom has known as it “dangerous coverage” and “one other try to seize cash for particular functions.”
In the meantime, a number of of his longtime consultants, together with Dan Newman and Brian Brokaw, have launched a marketing campaign alongside “enterprise and tech leaders” to kill the measure, which they’ve dubbed “Cease the Squeeze.” They’ve issued acquainted warnings that pinching the rich too laborious will drive them from the state, together with the essential tax base they supply.
At Wednesday’s New York Occasions DealBook Summit, Andrew Ross Sorkin requested Newsom about his opposition to the wealth tax thought, evaluating it to a proposal by current New York Metropolis Mayor-elect Zohran Mamdani, who pledged to extend the earnings taxes of New Yorkers who earn greater than $1 million per 12 months by 2% with a purpose to fund his city-wide free buses, common childcare, and city-owned grocery retailer applications.
Mamdani’s proposal was met with a litany of comparable warnings from Massive Apple bigwigs who threatened to flee town and others across the nation who stated they’d by no means transfer in.
However as Robin Kaiser-Schatzlein defined in October for the American Prospect: “The proof for that is skinny: largely memes shared by tech and finance folks… Analysis exhibits that the reality of the matter is nearer to the alternative. Rich people and their earnings transfer at decrease charges than different earnings brackets, even in response to a rise of private earnings tax.” Lots of those that sulked about Mamdani’s victory have notably begun making amends with the incoming mayor.
Furthermore, the comparability between Mamdani’s plan and the one proposed in California is defective to start with. As Harold Meyerson defined, additionally for the Prospect: “It’s a one-time-only tax, to be levied solely on billionaires’ present (i.e., 2025) internet price. Even when they transfer to Tasmania, they are going to nonetheless be liable for five% of this 12 months’s internet price.”
“Crucially, the tax gained’t crimp the fortunes of any billionaire who strikes into the state subsequent 12 months or any later 12 months, because it solely applies to the billionaires dwelling within the state this 12 months,” he added. “Due to this fact… the horrific specter of billionaire flight can’t be levied towards the California proposal.”
However, Sorkin framed Newsom as being in an existential battle of concepts with Mamdani, asking how the 2 might each characterize the Democratic Occasion when they’re so “diametrically opposed.”
“Properly, I need to be a big-tent celebration,” Newsom replied. “It’s about addition, not subtraction.”
Pushed on the query of whether or not there must be a “unifying concept of the case,” Newsom responded that “all of us need to be protected, all of us need to be revered, all of us need to be linked to one thing greater than ourselves. We’ve basic values that I feel outline our celebration, about social justice, financial justice.”
“We’ve pre-distribution Democrats, and we now have re-distribution Democrats,” he continued. “Therein lies the dialectic and therein lies the talk.”
Polling is scarce thus far on the probability of such a measure passing in California. However nationally, polls recommend that the overwhelming majority of Democrats fall on the “re-distribution” facet of Newsom’s “dialectic.” The truth is, nearly all of all Individuals do, no matter celebration affiliation.
Final 12 months, Inequality.org examined 55 nationwide and state polls about numerous completely different taxation insurance policies and located:
A billionaire earnings tax garnered essentially the most help throughout celebration identification. On common, two out of three (67%) of Individuals supported the tax together with 84% of Democrats, 64% of Independents, and 51% of Republicans.
In nationwide polls, a wealth tax had equally excessive ranges of help. Greater than three out of 5 Individuals supported the tax together with 78% of Democrats, 62% of Independents, and 51% of Republicans.
That sentiment solely appears to have grown for the reason that return of President Donald Trump. An Economist/YouGov ballot launched in early November discovered that 72% of Individuals stated that taxes on billionaires must be raised — together with 95% of Democrats, 75% of independents, and 48% of Republicans. Throughout the board, simply 15% stated they shouldn’t be raised.
Help stays excessive when the proposal is extra particular as effectively. On the eve of Mamdani’s election, despitre months of fearmongering, 64% of New Yorkers stated they backed his proposal, together with a slight plurality of self-identified conservatives, in line with a Siena Faculty ballot.
Many observers had been perplexed by how Newsom proposes to keep up a “huge tent” whereas opposing insurance policies supported by the general public inside it.
“A wealth tax is an enormous tent coverage until the one folks you care about are billionaires,” wrote Jonathan Cohn, the political director for Progressive Mass, a grassroots group in Massachusetts, on social media.
“Gavin Newsom — estimated internet price between $20 and $30 million — says he’s against a billionaire wealth tax. Coloration me shocked,” wrote the Columbia College lecturer Anthony Zenkus. “Democrats holding him up as a possible savior for 2028 is a transparent instance of not studying the room.”
Media that fights fascism
Truthout is funded nearly totally by readers — that’s why we will communicate fact to energy and reduce towards the mainstream narrative. However impartial journalists at Truthout face mounting political repression underneath Trump.
We depend on your help to outlive McCarthyist censorship. Please make a tax-deductible one-time or month-to-month donation.
