When SpaceX introduced final month that it had agreed to accumulate the favored AI coding startup Cursor for $60 billion, buyers believed the deal can be a boon for each corporations. Cursor would profit from getting the computing sources of a significant AI lab, which it may use to coach its personal fashions. In flip, SpaceX and Elon Musk would personal one of the crucial well-liked AI developer instruments available on the market.
What was much less clear was whether or not Cursor may stay an open platform after the deal, or if rival AI labs would proceed letting it provide their fashions. Third-party AI fashions have traditionally performed a vital position in Cursor’s enterprise. Whereas the corporate has began coaching its personal AI fashions in recent times, it has at all times allowed customers to select from quite a lot of choices from Anthropic, OpenAI, and different AI labs to energy its coding assistant.
That technique allowed Cursor to supply clients whichever mannequin was the very best, or most cost-effective, at a given second. It additionally benefited Anthropic and OpenAI, which each rely Cursor amongst their largest clients and characteristic the startup prominently of their advertising supplies.
After SpaceX’s acquisition is finalized later this yr, Cursor hopes to proceed working its AI coding product as a platform—serving fashions from Anthropic, OpenAI, and different AI labs alongside its personal—in line with individuals near Cursor.
I’ve my doubts about how it will truly play out, however whether or not or not Cursor stays mannequin agnostic stays one of many largest questions hanging over the AI business.
Eno Reyes, the cofounder and chief know-how officer of Manufacturing unit, a smaller AI coding startup that competes with Cursor, says he’s not sure that SpaceX’s rivals will mechanically reduce Cursor off simply because it is going to be owned by a competing AI lab. “I do not know if the choice is as black and white,” Eno tells me. “It’s truly tremendous unclear to us.”
Cursor declined to remark for this story. Anthropic, OpenAI, and SpaceX didn’t reply to requests for remark.
Making Frenemies
This isn’t the primary time that Cursor’s relationship with OpenAI and Anthropic has been examined. Traditionally, Cursor complemented the AI labs by distributing their fashions by means of its coding platform. However now it has more and more discovered itself in direct competitors with them as OpenAI’s Codex and Anthropic’s Claude Code have grow to be main strains of their respective companies. The SpaceX acquisition will doubtless solely intensify that rivalry.
SpaceX and Cursor can’t say rather a lot about how they’ll function post-acquisition, partially, as a result of the deal has not but closed and stays topic to “requisite regulatory approvals,” in line with paperwork SpaceX filed with the US Securities and Alternate Fee. However SpaceX is poised to get Cursor’s property, buyer contracts, and mental property—which means that OpenAI and Anthropic will now need to do enterprise with Musk in the event that they need to attain Cursor’s customers.
As soon as the acquisition is finalized, it’s attainable SpaceX will determine it doesn’t need to ship enterprise in the direction of Anthropic and OpenAI, two of its largest rivals within the frontier AI improvement area. Anthropic and OpenAI might decide they’re unwilling to promote their AI fashions by means of a product owned by Musk, who each corporations’ CEOs, Dario Amodei and Sam Altman, have butted heads with previously.
Traditionally, AI labs haven’t performed properly on the subject of promoting AI fashions to 1 one other. Final yr, Anthropic was fast to reduce off entry to Windsurf after information broke that OpenAI was buying the AI coding startup (the deal finally didn’t pan out). Anthropic cofounder Jared Kaplan stated on the time that it “can be odd to promote Claude to OpenAI.” Within the months since, Anthropic has labored to restrict OpenAI and SpaceX from utilizing its Claude AI fashions.
