Pending the failed cease-fire and Memorandum of Understanding [MOU] between Iran and America, all eyes have centered on the continued, troublesome negotiations – mediated by Pakistan, Oman, Turkey, Qatar, and Egypt – between America and Iran. The late Uri Lubrani, Israel’s final Ambassador to Iran in 1978, all the time warned concerning the perils of negotiating with the Iranians (“a nation of carpet weavers and of chess gamers”), whom he revered for his or her negotiating prowess, calling their manipulation of negotiations “a masterpiece of hoodwinking the world.” Different up to date consultants (former American intelligence officers) equivalent to Mark Fowler and Hamlet Yousef have made related observations. Their collective knowledge is price noting because the United States continues its diplomatic negotiations with Iran in at this time’s trendy model of ‘The Nice Recreation.’ What’s more and more pertinent in such negotiations pertains to the function of third-party nations equivalent to Oman, Turkey, Qatar, and Pakistan, not as mere mediators, however reasonably, particularly within the case of Pakistan and Turkey, as trendy purveyors of ‘intelligence diplomacy.’
Turkey’s street to intelligence diplomacy occurred strategically, reasonably than organically, as its International Minister Hakan Fidan (beforehand Director of its intelligence company MIT, for over a decade) and present MIT Director Ibrahim Kalin purposefully and deliberately positioned Turkey to play an more and more essential function in regional conflicts, covert diplomacy, and intelligence – as in Kalin’s phrases in a current speech – “drawing essential classes for our nation’s safety, strategic positioning, and regional perspective.” This doctrine had beforehand concerned backchannel negotiations in Gaza, Ukraine, Europe, the Balkans, Russia, (cf. the 2024 spy swap), and now, Iran. Different examples embrace the appointment of former senior MIT officer Gürsel Donmez as Turkey’s Ambassador to Austria, a key worldwide intelligence and diplomacy hub, and Turkey’s profitable internet hosting of the NATO summit final week.
Pakistan is, like Turkey, hardly new to the Nice Recreation. Readers will recall its function in facilitating – throughout 1971-1972 – the historic Kissinger-Nixon opening to China. However this 12 months’s MOU between Iran and America has thrust Pakistan (and its leaders Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif and navy chief Basic Asim Munir) into the limelight. Pakistan has dealt with delicate backchannel negotiations, hosted talks in Islamabad, and labored intently with its Saudi and GCC companions because the current MOU got here into play. However in its world of zero-sum diplomacy, Pakistan’s strategic successes in intelligence diplomacy heighten its regional and broader posture – particularly vis-à-vis America and serves to weaken India’s strategic place and diplomatic affect. In at this time’s world, as all the time, Pakistan’s achieve is India’s loss and China’s achieve (for my part, China is the REAL winner of the US-Iran conflict).
How does one negotiate, or facilitate negotiations with a rustic which is a mix of a civilization (Persia), theocracy, nation state (Iran), terrorist group, and legal entity (IRGC)? Iran has revealed itself to be a formidable negotiating accomplice, extra akin to a classy hostage taker, wherein conventional western, Harvard metrics of ‘Attending to Sure,’ or “Getting Previous No’ hardly apply. And but, like hostage takers in [law enforcement] hostage eventualities, Iran have to be appreciated as a ‘rational’ actor. The Iranians have brilliantly used ambiguity and opacity as negotiating methods, they usually have adeptly utilized social media to carve out complicated, ambiguous negotiating positions, along with uneven warfare, closure of the Straits of Hormuz, disinformation, propaganda, cognitive warfare, and conventional diplomatic efforts. One might surmise that the Iranians are actually gifted college students, who’ve learn – and survived! – President Trump’s The Artwork of the Deal. And for President Trump and his nationwide safety staff, negotiating with a lifeless, or severely injured, probably brain-damaged Supreme Chief Ayatollah Mojtaba Khamenei will be the most complicated process of all. Such eventualities aren’t taught in diplomatic colleges, enterprise faculties, or on the FBI Academy.
Negotiations involving legal terror teams such because the IRGC (now led by Basic Ahmad Vahidi) – who’ve dedicated quite a few worldwide acts of violence and terror over a long time – usually require third social gathering emissaries (as respectable governments can’t be seen as a predominant negotiating accomplice) and high-level intermediaries in ‘monitor 3’ diplomacy. Over the previous 20 years, examples embrace the previous German intelligence officer Dr. Gerhard Conrad’s hostage negotiations involving Hamas and Hezbollah, Swiss American lawyer Daniel Levin’s work within the Center East with The Liechtenstein Basis for State Governance, and Swiss diplomat Pascal Holiger’s negotiations involving the victims of Boko Haram in Nigeria. The function of empathy, tradition, belief, language, and nuance stays critically worthwhile in such delicate endeavors. And at this time, belief stays the coin of the realm as Third-party nations equivalent to Pakistan and Turkey, in addition to others, facilitate ongoing diplomatic negotiations with Iran’s IRGC management.
The Iran negotiations will contain extra time, which stays Iran’s finest weapon, as it may proceed to trigger financial ache for the West, particularly America, because it approaches the November 2026 midterm elections. Throughout its devastating conflict with Iraq in the course of the Eighties – with over 1 million Iranian casualties – Iran fought for 8 years earlier than the late Ayatollah Khomeini made a peace deal, “ingesting from the poisoned chalice.” And a battered, weakened Iran continues to be affected person and resolved. And so, a key query now includes President Trump, and what actions – diplomatic or navy – he would possibly take subsequent, and whether or not he too, will likely be compelled to “drink from the poisoned chalice.” The stakes couldn’t be larger. And practitioners of intelligence diplomacy, equivalent to Pakistan, Turkey, and different actors, will proceed to be linchpins of any diplomatic successes. However in contrast to previous related negotiations, which concerned discretion and secrecy, at this time’s intelligence diplomacy takes place within the glare of the media and its inheritor obvious, social media — a curse and a blessing for its practitioners. What hasn’t modified is that phrases and actions – particularly these of President Trump and the Iranian management – nonetheless matter, greater than ever.
Dr. Kenneth Dekleva served as a Regional Medical Officer/Psychiatrist with the U.S. Dept. of State from 2002-2016 and is at the moment CEO of Blackwood Advisory Options LLC, and Professor of Psychiatry, UT Southwestern Medical Heart, Dallas, TX. The views expressed by Dr. Dekleva are fully his personal and don’t symbolize the views of the U.S. Authorities, the U.S. Dept. of State, or UT Southwestern Medical Heart.
The Cipher Transient is dedicated to publishing a spread of views on nationwide safety points submitted by deeply skilled nationwide safety professionals. Opinions expressed are these of the writer and don’t symbolize the views or opinions of The Cipher Transient.
Have a perspective to share primarily based in your expertise within the nationwide safety discipline? Ship it to Editor@thecipherbrief.com for publication consideration.
Learn extra expert-driven nationwide safety insights, perspective and evaluation in The Cipher Transient
